Skip to content

Chinese Classics


Wengu Chinese Classics : Original Text : English Text

E = mc^2 = hv / λ

I am studying Harmonics right now. It appears the formula E = mc^2 = hv / λ has great significance and π a role in every equation.

Physics : HyperSpace

HyperSpace can be defined in the following manner:

Physical

d1 : Root +1 : Line : Distance : Metre : Unology : Mono

d2 : Root +2 : Area : Intensity : Candela : Biology : Digo

d3 : Root +3 : Cube : Molarity : Mole : Triology : Numro

d4 : Root +4 : HyperCube : Mass : Kilogram : Quadology : Letro

t1 : Root +5 : Circle : Time : Second : Pentology : Chrono

t2 : Root +6 : Ellipse : Temperature : Celcius : Hexology : Audio

t3 : Root +7 : Sphere : Current : Ampere : Heptology : Video

t4 : Root +8 : HyperSphere : Gravity : “Creatre”? : Octology : Neuro


Table 1.  SI base units


SI base unit


Base quantity Name Symbol
length meter m
mass kilogram kg
time second s
electric current ampere A
thermodynamic temperature kelvin K
amount of substance mole mol
luminous intensity candela cd

Cal

Root 0 is the Hypotenuse of a Point

Logical

Root -1 is the Hypotenuse of a AntiLine
Root -2 is the Hypotenuse of a AntiSquare
Root -3 is the Hypotenuse of a AntiCube
Root -4 is the Hypotenuse of a AntiHyperCube
Root -5 is the Hypotenuse of a AntiCircle
Root -6 is the Hypotenuse of a AntiEllipse
Root -7 is the Hypotenuse of a AntiSphere
Root -8 is the Hypotenuse of a AntiHyperSphere

In any Space all these HyperSpaces exist at the same time.

So, You Think Science has a Monopoly on Knowledge?

Toaism

Hinduism

Buddhism

Islamism

Christism

Judaism

Eight Days

E. F. Codd? Sorry, No Relation

I have been studying relational databases for 30 years. Relational technology is a compromise between a single table flat database and a two table associational database. I have also studied the math. It turns out that linear algebra upon which the whole relational shooting match is based doesn’t even meet the criteria to be called an algebra. In tensor analysis any serious mathematician doesn’t use matrices because they are useless after a small dimensional threshold. Actuarial tables? Use the damned equation, bonehead.

Let’s put it this way. You can denormalize until you have a single table that comprises the entire database or normalize until you have two tables: a three column subject-verb-object table that describes the column index (subject), the row index (object) and the intersection index (verb) and a two column index-value (entity) table. Or you can you can have the intermediate mess of tables we call a relational database.

I no longer give a damn what any relational technologist or technician says. The only reason relational databases exist is because the hard disks were too damned small and E. F. Codd and Chris Date were too enamored with their own mental masturbation to normalize their damned structure. Oracle, MySQL and the rest are a bunch of frauds and they don’t know it or they won’t admit it.

White Hex Corporation is declaring Peace by stopping the War called Relational Database Technology.

Constitution : White Hex Corporation

Constitution

White Hex Corporate Freedoms

1. Freedom of Creation

2. Freedom of Vidation

3. Freedom of Audation

4. Freedom of Nodation

5. Freedom of Vocation

6. Freedom of Legation

7. Freedom of Armation

8. Freedom of Matation

White Hex Corporate members can extend these Freedoms

White Hex Corporate members cannot constrain these Freedoms

Effective 2010-0101

Grant Morgan Czerepak

Chief Executive Officer

White Hex Corporation

易經 : Yì Jīng : Change Book

White Hex Corporation is Changing

易經

Yì Jīng

Change Book


Introducing


易經面經

Yì Jīng Miàn Jīng

“Change Book Face Book”

A Facebook Gift App

开中国: Open China

White Hex Corporation fully supports Google

regarding Freedom of Speech in China.

Chinese People’s Republic Constitution

Article 35: Freedom of Speech, Press, Assembly

Citizens of the People’s Republic of China enjoy:

Freedom of Speech

Freedom of Press

Freedom of Assembly

Freedom of Association

Freedom of Procession

Freedom of Demonstration

http://www.usconstitution.net/china.html

Google China Policy: http://tinyurl.com/yhfgo9k

China attacks Google: http://tinyurl.com/yhzmuo6

White House backs Google: http://tinyurl.com/ycundep

White Hex Corporation Policy
White Hex Corporation will work to create an environment world wide for:

Freedom of Religion

Freedom of Expression

Freedom of Association

Freedom of Location

Unicode: Humanity’s Character Set

I have been putting in significant time absorbing the entire contents  of this book.

Unicode is a computing industry standard allowing computers to consistently represent and manipulate text expressed in most of the world’s writing systems. Developed in tandem with the Universal Character Set standard and published in book form as The Unicode Standard, the latest version of Unicode consists of a repertoire of more than 107,000 characters covering 90 scripts, a set of code charts for visual reference, an encoding methodology and set of standard character encodings, an enumeration of character properties such as upper and lower case, a set of reference data computer files, and a number of related items, such as character properties, rules for normalization, decomposition, collation, rendering, and bidirectional display order (for the correct display of text containing both right-to-left scripts, such as Arabic or Hebrew, and left-to-right scripts).[1]

The Unicode Consortium, the nonprofit organization that coordinates Unicode’s development, has the ambitious goal of eventually replacing existing character encoding schemes with Unicode and its standard Unicode Transformation Format (UTF) schemes, as many of the existing schemes are limited in size and scope and are incompatible with multilingual environments.

Unicode’s success at unifying character sets has led to its widespread and predominant use in the internationalization and localization of computer software. The standard has been implemented in many recent technologies, including XML, the Java programming language, the Microsoft .NET Framework, and modern operating systems.

Unicode can be implemented by different character encodings. The most commonly used encodings are UTF-8 (which uses 1 byte for all ASCII characters, which have the same code values as in the standard ASCII encoding, and up to 4 bytes for other characters), the now-obsolete UCS-2 (which uses 2 bytes for all characters, but does not include every character in the Unicode standard), and UTF-16 (which extends UCS-2, using 4 bytes to encode characters missing from UCS-2).

The Unicode Consortium: http://unicode.org/

Kai: White Hex Open Source Project

In the beginning was the priest. Writing materials were produced in limited quantities. Education was monopolized. Scription was a laborious task and difficult to correct with the materials used. Text made filing easy.  Thus you had the Flat database model.

Then came the scribe. Writing materials increased in availability. Education became institutionalized. Scription and transcription were performed by trained personnel who recorded the dictate of untrained personnel in an academic tongue.  Libraries made indexing easy.  Entire scriptoriums were dedicated to the process of document production. Thus you had the Hierarchical database model.

Then came the writer. Writing materials were mass produced. Education became publicized. Individuals wrote their own documents in their own tongue. The printing press guaranteed mass distribution.  Formatted printing made tabulation easy.  Thus you had the Relational database model.

Then came the layperson. Publishing became universally available via the internet.  Education became personalized.  Networks made linking easy.   Thus you had the Associative Model of Data conceived by Simon Williams.

sentences3.jpg

Simon has developed an Associational Database Management System (ADBMS) called Sentences. It foregoes the use of tables and inferred relationships for the use of single attribute entities and explicit relationships. The schema is intrinsic to the database making the business rules immediately available to anyone who accesses it. Finally, it is internet ready with the capability to be distributed across servers. It is a simple, elegant concept well executed, however there are still some hurdles.

The main hurdle is acceptance. Simon has met strong resistance from relational model advocates. He currently has a website offering the Sentences Enterprise Edition for free to anyone who wants it without technical support, but I do not think that is the answer. I believe that the potential of the Associative Model of Data is not fully realized in the Sentences proprietary implementation. If Sentences is to become the industry standard database for the internet, Simon Williams will have to open up Sentences to global collaboration as an open source project. Only then will the Associative Model reach the tipping point that puts it ahead of the relational model as the database architecture of choice for the lay internet user.

Simon needs Java Programmers for development and support of Sentences Open Source and Mathematicians to develop Associational Calculus.

Links:

I highly recommend going to lazysoft.com and downloading the Sentences Personal and Enterprise Edition to get a feel for this new architecture.  Downloading and intalling the latest Java runtime environment and Sentences can be done in roughly ten minutes.  A populated sample database is ready for exploration.

White Hex Corporation plans to use Sentences as part of its multi-media technology tool set.

Simon Williams, the creator of the Associative Model of Data, its architecture and the Sentences Associative Database Mangement System, had a discussion with me the other day. He told me that to make Sentences an Open Source project, he needs two things. First, he needs a Lead Java Developer to guide the Sentences open source project as Sentences is completely Java based. Second, he needs to get the user group for Sentences to reach the tipping point, which means developing Sentences databases and applications. I’ve used the relational data model for twenty years and the associative model is the next logical step in database architecture. If you want to advance internet database technology by helping this architecture and this product move into the mainstream, here’s your chance. Simon can be reached by email: simon.williams at lazysoft.com

The Infinite Czerepak Regression

The relational model is said to be based on Cartesian mathematics.  Descartes greatest contribution was a Cartesian geometry which was the creation of a coordinate system for Euclidean geometry and geometry in general.  Whatever database you use, it has a coordinate system which gives it its structure.  Even a single bit is a structure all by itself.  Cartesian geometry took Euclidean geometry out of synthesis based on theorems and logic and moved it into coordinates based on analysis and algebra.  We are dealing with linear analysis and linear algebra when we are talking about the relational model and it forms the foundation for calculus and relational calculus which lead to  E. F. Codd’s inventing the relational model for database management, the theoretical basis for relational databases.

The truth about a relational database is conceptually it is only one table.  Only one.  Any relational database could be converted into a single spreadsheet.  So, why all the tables?

First, every database can be separated into the logical structure and the physical content.  The logical structure is called the schema and the physical content is called the data.  Logical and physical separation optimizes the administration, management and employment of the database.  As soon as you separate the logical and physical tables you eliminate an enormous amount of duplication in the system as well as all the effort required to maintain the correct values among all the duplicates.  This optimization is the first normalization of the database.

Now, Codd came up with what are known as The Twelve Rules which I have copied from Wikipedia:

Rule 0: The system must qualify as relational, as a database, and as a management system.

For a system to qualify as a relational database management system (RDBMS), that system must use its relational facilities (exclusively) to manage the database.

Rule 1: The information rule:

All information in the database is to be represented in one and only one way, namely by values in column positions within rows of tables.

Rule 2: The guaranteed access rule:

All data must be accessible. This rule is essentially a restatement of the fundamental requirement for primary keys. It says that every individual scalar value in the database must be logically addressable by specifying the name of the containing table, the name of the containing column and the primary key value of the containing row.

Rule 3: Systematic treatment of null values:

The DBMS must allow each field to remain null (or empty). Specifically, it must support a representation of “missing information and inapplicable information” that is systematic, distinct from all regular values (for example, “distinct from zero or any other number”, in the case of numeric values), and independent of data type. It is also implied that such representations must be manipulated by the DBMS in a systematic way.

Rule 4: Active online catalog based on the relational model:

The system must support an online, inline, relational catalog that is accessible to authorized users by means of their regular query language. That is, users must be able to access the database’s structure (catalog) using the same query language that they use to access the database’s data.

Rule 5: The comprehensive data sublanguage rule:

The system must support at least one relational language that
  1. Has a linear syntax
  2. Can be used both interactively and within application programs,
  3. Supports data definition operations (including view definitions), data manipulation operations (update as well as retrieval), security and integrity constraints, and transaction management operations (begin, commit, and rollback).

Rule 6: The view updating rule:

All views that are theoretically updatable must be updatable by the system.

Rule 7: High-level insert, update, and delete:

The system must support set-at-a-time insert, update, and delete operators. This means that data can be retrieved from a relational database in sets constructed of data from multiple rows and/or multiple tables. This rule states that insert, update, and delete operations should be supported for any retrievable set rather than just for a single row in a single table.

Rule 8: Physical data independence:

Changes to the physical level (how the data is stored, whether in arrays or linked lists etc.) must not require a change to an application based on the structure.

Rule 9: Logical data independence:

Changes to the logical level (tables, columns, rows, and so on) must not require a change to an application based on the structure. Logical data independence is more difficult to achieve than physical data independence.

Rule 10: Integrity independence:

Integrity constraints must be specified separately from application programs and stored in the catalog. It must be possible to change such constraints as and when appropriate without unnecessarily affecting existing applications.

Rule 11: Distribution independence:

The distribution of portions of the database to various locations should be invisible to users of the database. Existing applications should continue to operate successfully :
  1. when a distributed version of the DBMS is first introduced; and
  2. when existing distributed data are redistributed around the system.

Rule 12: The nonsubversion rule:

If the system provides a low-level (record-at-a-time) interface, then that interface cannot be used to subvert the system, for example, bypassing a relational security or integrity constraint.

Now there is another way to look at Codd’s Twelve Rules that is not often discussed directly and that is the OSI Model. The OSI Model is used to describe network layers and it is perfectly logical to regard a relational database as a dynamic lattice network composed of conceptual layers.

The Open System Interconnection Reference Model (OSI Reference Model or OSI Model) is an abstract description for layered communications and computer network protocol design. It was developed as part of the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) initiative. In its most basic form, it divides network architecture into seven layers which, from top to bottom, are the Application, Presentation, Session, Transport, Network, Data-Link, and Physical Layers. It is therefore often referred to as the OSI Seven Layer Model.

Application
(Layer 7)
This layer supports application and end-user processes. Communication partners are identified, quality of service is identified, user authentication and privacy are considered, and any constraints on data syntax are identified. Everything at this layer is application-specific. This layer provides application services for file transfers, e-mail, and other network software services. Telnet and FTP are applications that exist entirely in the application level. Tiered application architectures are part of this layer.
Presentation
(Layer 6)
This layer provides independence from differences in data representation (e.g., encryption) by translating from application to network format, and vice versa. The presentation layer works to transform data into the form that the application layer can accept. This layer formats and encrypts data to be sent across a network, providing freedom from compatibility problems. It is sometimes called the syntax layer.
Session
(Layer 5)
This layer establishes, manages and terminates connections between applications. The session layer sets up, coordinates, and terminates conversations, exchanges, and dialogues between the applications at each end. It deals with session and connection coordination.
Transport
(Layer 4)
This layer provides transparent transfer of data between end systems, or hosts, and is responsible for end-to-end error recovery and flow control. It ensures complete data transfer.
Network
(Layer 3)
This layer provides switching and routing technologies, creating logical paths, known as virtual circuits, for transmitting data from node to node. Routing and forwarding are functions of this layer, as well as addressing, internetworking, error handling, congestion control and packet sequencing.
Data Link
(Layer 2)
At this layer, data packets are encoded and decoded into bits. It furnishes transmission protocol knowledge and management and handles errors in the physical layer, flow control and frame synchronization. The data link layer is divided into two sub layers: The Media Access Control (MAC) layer and the Logical Link Control (LLC) layer. The MAC sub layer controls how a computer on the network gains access to the data and permission to transmit it. The LLC layer controls frame synchronization, flow control and error checking.
Physical
(Layer 1)
This layer conveys the bit stream – electrical impulse, light or radio signal — through the network at the electrical and mechanical level. It provides the hardware means of sending and receiving data on a carrier, including defining cables, cards and physical aspects. Fast Ethernet, RS232, and ATM are protocols with physical layer components.

A layer is a collection of conceptually similar functions that provide services to the layer above it and receives service from the layer below it. On each layer an instance provides services to the instances at the layer above and requests service from the layer below. For example, a layer that provides error-free communications across a network provides the path needed by applications above it, while it calls the next lower layer to send and receive packets that make up the contents of the path. Conceptually two instances at one layer are connected by a horizontal protocol connection on that layer.

If we look at the Relational Model and Codd’s rules in the context of the OSI Model we can think of the rules in the following way as a hybrid I call the Czerepak Rules:

The Czerepak Rules

  • Why Layer: Protect Application Input definition from Catalog View definition.
  • See Layer: Protect Catalog View definition from Catalog User definition
  • Use Layer: Protect Catalog User definition from Catalog Language definition.
  • Act Layer: Protect Catalog Language definition from Catalog Column definition
  • Col Layer: Protect Catalog Column definition from Catalog Row definition
  • Row Layer: Protect Catalog Row Definition from Catalog Constraint definition
  • Yes Layer: Protect Catalog Constraint definition from Catalog Input definition
  • Why Layer: Protect Catalog Input definition from Data View definition.
  • See Layer: Protect Data View definition from Data User definition
  • Use Layer: Protect Data User definition from Data Language  definition
  • Act Layer: Protect Data Language definition from Data Column definition
  • Col Layer: Protect Data Column definition from Data Row definition
  • Row Layer: Protect Data Row Definition from Data Constraint definition
  • Yes Layer: Protect Data Constraint definition from Data Input definition
  • Why Layer: Application Layer: Protect Data Input definition from Access Method View Definition

If you look carefully at the list you will see that it extends beyond the top and beyond the bottom in an infinite regression.

“Turtles all the way down,” or “The Infinite Turtle Theory,” refers to the infinite regression problem in cosmology posed by the Unmoved mover paradox. The phrase was popularized by Stephen Hawking in 1988. The “turtle” metaphor in the anecdote represents a popular notion of a “primitive cosmological myth“, viz. the flat earth supported on the back of a World Turtle.

It is interesting to note that “czerepak” is a Yiddish word which means “turtle”.

A comparable metaphor describing the circular cause and consequence for the same problem is the “chicken and egg problem“. Another metaphor addressing the problem of infinite regression, albeit not in a cosmological context, is Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? The same problem in epistemology is known as the Münchhausen Trilemma.